Research
My research combines intellectual history, the history of economics, and social history. It borders Science and Technology Studies and the history of science. The common thread is an interest in policy action and collective decision-making: how collective actors come to understand a situation, define what ought to be done, and act upon it.
Collective decision-making is not simply the spontaneous aggregation of individual choices, but a process that requires forms of knowledge, authority, and judgement. While the literature has so far underlined the importance of models and other forms of representation as part of the "art of world-making", my principal concern is somewhat different: how information, expertise and values are brought together in processes of collective decision-making and policy action.
So far, my research has investigated the production and use of information in 20th century European agriculture and in 18th century political economy, but it is now expanding to other areas and topics (European industrial policy, and the investigation of backwardness).
Agriculture
My research has focused on the production of knowledge for agricultural policy, and on the different empirical practices, organisations and forms of expertise through which agriculture was made observable. Accountancy data proved central to the data revolution that transformed agriculture since the early 20th century, which was engineered and carried out by experts and farmers' organizations.
Observing agriculture
Publications
D’Onofrio, F. (2016),Observing Agriculture in Early Twentieth-Century Italy: Agricultural Economists and Statistics[-->].
D’Onofrio, F. (2012), “Making variety simple: agricultural economists in Southern Italy, 1907–1909”, History of Political Economy, 44, pp. 93–113.
D’Onofrio, F. (2013), “Les statistiques agricoles de l’Italie libérale et les porteurs d’intérêts (1907–1929)”, in Fraboulet, D., Druelle-Korn, C. and Vernus, P. (eds),Les organisations patronales et la sphère publique. Europe XIXe et XXe siècles, Rennes: PUR, pp. 143–152.
D’Onofrio, F. and Tyler, H. (2022), “Wolf Ladejinsky: Field Trips for a Democratic Countryside”,History of Political Economy, 54(3), pp. 459–481[-->].
Farm accountancy data
Projects
FARMACCOUNTA[-->]
DATAREV[-->]
People
Marina Chuchko[-->]
Myriam Lichani[-->]
Publications
D’Onofrio, F. (2025), “The intentional spread of farm accountancy offices in Europe 1870–1950”, in Joly, N. and D’Onofrio, F. (eds),The Invention of the Accounting Farmer, Woodbridge: Boydell & Brewer.
Joly, N. and D’Onofrio, F. (eds) (2025),The Invention of the Accounting Farmer, Woodbridge: Boydell & Brewer.
D’Onofrio, F., “The experience of value and the value of experience: land valuation in the 19th and 20th century”, submitted to Science in Context.
D’Onofrio, F. and Chuchko, M., “The evolution of representativeness criteria in agricultural economics: the case of farm accountancy data”.
International agricultural statistics and organisations
Publications
D’Onofrio, F. (2026), “From the International Institute of Agriculture to the Food and Agriculture Organisation”, in Cabo, M., Fernández Prieto, L. and Pan-Montojo, J. (eds),From rural modernities to agricultural modernisation. Technologies and discourses on progress in the 20th century, Woodbridge: Boydell & Brewer, pp. 101–118.
D’Onofrio, F. (2017), “Agricultural numbers: the statistics of the International Institute of Agriculture in the Interwar period”,Agricultural History Review, 65(2), pp. 277–296.
D’Onofrio, F. and Mignemi, N. (2025), “The making of perfect markets: Agriculture and international statistics in the early 20th century”,Journal of World History, 36(3), pp. 409–439[-->].
D’Onofrio, F. and Mignemi, N. (2023), “The International Institute of Agriculture and the information infrastructure of world trade (1905–1947)”,Histoire et Mesure, 38(1), pp. 13–38[-->].
Agricultural experts
Publications
D’Onofrio, F. (forthcoming), “Agricultural experts and the rise of agricultural economics in Italy”, in Planas, J. and Segers, Y. (eds),Agricultural Modernisation in Europe, 1880–1980: The Role of Experts, Woodbridge: Boydell & Brewer.
D’Onofrio, F. (2017), “Micro-foundations of Italian agrarianism: Italian agricultural economists and fascism”,Agricultural History, 92(3), pp. 369–396.
Blog post
The margins of the field: rediscovering agricultural economists for the history of ideas[-->]
Conference
Two Centuries of Agricultural Futures: Actors and Networks of Agricultural Policy-Making in Europe from the 1760s to the 1960s, Bologna, July 2026, co-organised with Myriam Lichani[-->]and Filippo Soramel[-->].[-->]
The rise of political economy
At the origins of political economy, in the eighteenth century, lies a concrete concern with government action. The Neapolitan tradition of Economia civile articulated this concern in terms of felicitas publica[-->]and of thefunctions of government[-->].
Policy action, in this context, depended on the construction of an information space that was complex and articulated. My research on the administrative culture of Ancien Régime Naples has examined the conflicts surrounding the production, circulation and authority of information, particularly in relation to grain policy, in Numeri falsi e numeri errati: le basi informative della politica granaria a Napoli nella seconda metà del secolo XVIII[-->].
My current research takes this question further by investigating the emergence, in the eighteenth century, of a distinctive attitude towards facts. Much of the existing literature has explored the relationship between political economy and the natural sciences, particularly Newtonian physics. My research instead explores the connections between economic knowledge and the antiquarian and philological traditions, asking how these traditions contributed to the emergence of what could count as an economic fact[-->].
European industrial policy
Most work on the economic constitution of European institutions has focused on the creation of the Common Market and Single Market, and on the Economic and Monetary Union. My new research takes a different approach by examining more closely the developmental ambitions of European institutions and the ways in which they sought to shape investment and economic transformation.
I am particularly interested in the investment priorities identified by European organisations: first through the activities of the European Investment Bank, and subsequently through initiatives such as the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) and European regional policies.
Coup d'œil
I am also investigating the early-modern concept ofcoup d'œil as a way of understanding decision-making and practical judgement[-->].
Backwardness
I plan a new project on the history ofbackwardness: how the modern concept emerged and became an object of policy intervention. Critical approaches to development studies have traditionally understood backwardness as the result of a foreign gaze upon an organic community, whether a village or a nation. My research instead explores how metrics of progress and backwardness may be constructed within the community itself, and how they can support strategies of catching up through reform, emulation and adaptation. Backwardness thus becomes not simply an external judgement, but an element in the political strategies of historical actors themselves.